Instead of reading about poverty in their textbooks, 100 tenth graders at Martin Luther Secondary School had a social studies lesson served up in their school cafeteria.
Rimbach, Germany (June 4, 2007). About half of the Hunger Banquet’s participants represented the low income population of the world, which meant they waited almost an hour on the floor for a small portion of plain rice. The looks cast at the tables where luckier peers were served either soup or a three course dinner were wistful and envious.
The students were participating in an experiment conceived by British aid organization Oxfam International to make income disparity in the world tangible. At a Hunger Banquet, guests are divided up proportionally to the numbers of rich, poor, and middle income people in the world – and they eat accordingly. Bringing the experiment to Martin Luther in Rimbach was the idea of guest teacher Catherine Reynolds, who had participated in and helped organize similar events while a student at the College of William and Mary in her native USA.
In order to heighten suspense, Ms. Reynolds kept details of the event a secret. Students came expecting a meal, but not until they funnelled into the dining hall and opened an envelope revealing their socioeconomic status did the full picture begin to emerge. Only the luckiest students, fewer than 15 %, were invited to join the wealthy society at proper tables and have the lunch fare that the average Rimbach student expects, in this case, lasagna.
At the Hunger Banquet, even ladling lentil soup at cramped tables seemed like an extravagance in the eyes of the 50% of students – corresponding to the half of the world that lives on less than $2 a day – who had to eat rice while sitting on cardboard boxes on the floor. Low income diners were forced to wait in line for water and weren’t guaranteed to get it. Still hungry after eating her ration, one poor student asked a neighbor from the middle income group if she could have an empty pot of lentil soup just to scrape the sides.
After the event was over, small groups met to debrief their experiences. Behavior observed at the Hunger Banquet stimulated a lot of discussion and insight, and many participants reported feeling empathy. “I realized how much luck is involved in who is born into a rich country like Germany,” commented upperclassman Akina Ingold.
Though many students felt similarly to Ingold, no privileged guests reached out to help the poor during the experiment. “The rich immediately put up a wall,” mentioned Clemens Frassine. “They pretended not to see so that they didn’t feel guilty – just like rich nations.” Not only did the dozen students in the high income group keep their eyes on their plates, none offered to give up even a bite of lasagna, let alone a seat.
Most students agreed that the experiment, though contrived, was thought-provoking and had parallels to real life. There was a common objection, however, that the situation of the low income group was not grim enough. In the words of one student, “The poor were allowed to go back for seconds. That was lame!” Surprisingly, few underfed students complained about being hungry. Some were engrossed in exploring new perspectives. And all, perhaps, were relieved that they would soon return to their familiar world and the Dönerbuden around the corner.


